But then there are the exceptions that defy this rule. There is Suri Cruise, though I feel her perfection is in part due to the baby formula that gets dropped down from space and sold at $1000 an ounce at the Church of Scientology. Or Brad and Angelina's baby (can't seem to remember their names), though 80% of their brood of children are not genetically their own.
As an avid biologist, I like to keep tabs on beautiful people and their children. I especially like to run pools on pregnant celebrities, not on the due date, but on how ugly their children be on a scale of 1-10 (1 being the ugliest and 10 being not ugly at all). The most recent being Nicole Richie's child, which scored a 3, and was eerily accurate:

To rub even more salt into the wounds, the woman named her child "Harlow". What the hell is this, the 1930s?
Then I came across a "match made in heaven"punnett square: Alessandra Ambrosio and her beau Jamie Mazur.

Dayyyyammnn. I'm jealous. I wish I were named after a delicious salad.
But wait. This is what was hurled out of the loins of the Victoria's Secret Angel:

My, what a stark contrast. Not only does her daughter look nothing like the original, but lacks the fashion sense to boot. Don't give up yet, Ms. Ambrosia. Give it a few years, lose the bow, and you may just may have the chance to work some desk job in the back corner of some office somewhere.
Punnett square. lol. what we should be marveling at are the dark forces that are holding that bow on for what it seems like dear life.
ReplyDelete